Application of PESTLE and SWOT in Conservation Planning
Downloads
The U Minh Thuong National Park (UMT) wetland ecosystem faces mounting pressures from climate change and anthropogenic activities, severely impacting ecosystem services and the livelihoods of vulnerable buffer zone communities. Developing a management plan that balances conservation with socio-economic development remains a complex challenge. Consequently, this study employs an integrated PESTLE and SWOT framework to formulate a sustainable management strategy. This study utilizes secondary data from reliable sources combined with field observations of the wetland ecosystem. The findings identify key strengths, including high biodiversity, a unique peatland ecosystem, and cultural heritage, alongside critical weaknesses such as fire risks associated with peat, inadequate tourism infrastructure, and shortages in specialized human resources. Leveraging these insights, we propose a comprehensive framework consisting of four priority solutions. First, implementing adaptive water management to mimic natural hydrological regimes. Second, diversifying local livelihoods and empowering communities through resource co-management models. Third, commercializing ecosystem services, such as carbon credits and Payment for Forest Environmental Services. Finally, leveraging smart technology to enhance biodiversity monitoring and forest fire prevention. By integrating these strategies, this research provides a robust, evidence-based foundation for policymakers to foster sustainable development in U Minh Thuong.
Downloads
[1] Fentaw, G., Beneberu, G., Wondie, A., & Eneyew, B. G. (2025). Ecosystem services of wetlands in the upper Abbay River basin, Ethiopia. Ecological Indicators, 171. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113142.
[2] Sarmah, B., & Mahanta, R. (2025). Assessing the inter-linkage between ecosystem services and livelihood assets: case study of Deepor Beel Ramsar site in Assam, India. Society Register, 9(2), 35-50. doi:10.14746/sr.2025.9.2.02.
[3] Yan, F., & Zhang, S. (2019). Ecosystem service decline in response to wetland loss in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Ecological Engineering, 130, 117–121. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.02.009.
[4] Balwan, Wahied Khawar, & Kour, S. (2021). Wetland- An Ecological Boon for the Environment. East African Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 4(3), 38–48. doi:10.36349/easjals.2021.v04i03.001.
[5] Bhardwaj, P. P. (2025). Wetland Conservation for Biodiversity and Ecosystem. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 14(5), 193–198. doi:10.35629/7722-1405193198.
[6] Kingsford, R. T., Basset, A., & Jackson, L. (2016). Wetlands: conservation’s poor cousins. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 26(5), 892–916. doi:10.1002/aqc.2709.
[7] Li, X., Bellerby, R., Craft, C., & Widney, S. E. (2018). Coastal wetland loss, consequences, and challenges for restoration. Anthropocene Coasts, 1(1), 1–15. doi:10.1139/anc-2017-0001.
[8] Nyandwi, O., & Ndikubwimana, I. (2024). The Effects of Wetland Degradation on Ecological Species. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(4), 2160–2169. doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24apr1244.
[9] Sonia, Kumari Sita, & Vaneet Kumar. (2025). Wetlands: crucial ecosystem service providers: A contemporary review. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 14(2), 064–067. doi:10.30574/ijsra.2025.14.2.0222.
[10] Yousaf, A., Khalid, N., Aqeel, M., Noman, A., Naeem, N., Sarfraz, W., Ejaz, U., Qaiser, Z., & Khalid, A. (2021). Nitrogen Dynamics in Wetland Systems and Its Impact on Biodiversity. Nitrogen (Switzerland), 2(2), 196–217. doi:10.3390/nitrogen2020013.
[11] Ramachandra, T. V., Asulabha, K. S., Sincy, V., & Jaishanker, R. (2024). Wetlands for human well-being. Journal of Environmental Biology, 45(2), 1-5. doi:10.22438/jeb/45/2/Editorial.
[12] Hinson, A. L., McCarty, G., Du, L., Sichko, C., & Maguire, K. (2024). Native bee Pollination Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Wetlands and Riparian Protected Lands. Wetlands, 44(8), 116. doi:10.1007/s13157-024-01872-x.
[13] Jacobson, M. M., Schummer, M. L., Fierke, M. K., Chesshire, P. R., & Leopold, D. J. (2025). Wild bee assemblages and pollination networks of managed emergent wetlands in central New York, USA. Ecology and evolution, 15(2), e70847. doi:10.1002/ece3.70847.
[14] Agaton, C. B., & Guila, P. M. C. (2023). Ecosystem Services Valuation of Constructed Wetland as a Nature-Based Solution to Wastewater Treatment. Earth (Switzerland), 4(1), 78–92. doi:10.3390/earth4010006.
[15] Wu, Y., Sun, J., Hu, B., Zhang, G., & Rousseau, A. N. (2023). Wetland-based solutions against extreme flood and severe drought: Efficiency evaluation of risk mitigation. Climate Risk Management, 40. doi:10.1016/j.crm.2023.100505.
[16] Song, A., Liang, S., Li, H., & Yan, B. (2024). Effects of biodiversity on functional stability of freshwater wetlands: a systematic review. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1397683.
[17] Tan, L., Ge, Z., Ji, Y., Lai, D. Y. F., Temmerman, S., Li, S., Li, X., & Tang, J. (2022). Land use and land cover changes in coastal and inland wetlands cause soil carbon and nitrogen loss. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 31(12), 2541–2563. doi:10.1111/geb.13597.
[18] Qiu, J., Zhang, Y., & Ma, J. (2024). Wetland habitats supporting waterbird diversity: Conservation perspective on biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship. Journal of Environmental Management, 357, 120663. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120663.
[19] Zhao, Q., Chen, Y., Gone, K. P., Wells, E., Margeson, K., & Sherren, K. (2023). Modelling cultural ecosystem services in agricultural Dykelands and tidal wetlands to inform coastal infrastructure decisions: A social media data approach. Marine Policy, 150. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105533.
[20] MEA. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., United States.
[21] Ballut-Dajud, G. A., Herazo, L. C. S., Fernández-Lambert, G., Marín-Muñiz, J. L., Méndez, M. C. L., & Betanzo-Torres, E. A. (2022). Factors Affecting Wetland Loss: A Review. Land, 11(3), 434. doi:10.3390/land11030434.
[22] Huu Nguyen, H., Dargusch, P., Moss, P., & Tran, D. B. (2016). A review of the drivers of 200 years of wetland degradation in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Regional Environmental Change, 16(8), 2303–2315. doi:10.1007/s10113-016-0941-3.
[23] Fluet-Chouinard, E., Stocker, B. D., Zhang, Z., Malhotra, A., Melton, J. R., Poulter, B., Kaplan, J. O., Goldewijk, K. K., Siebert, S., Minayeva, T., Hugelius, G., Joosten, H., Barthelmes, A., Prigent, C., Aires, F., Hoyt, A. M., Davidson, N., Finlayson, C. M., Lehner, B., … McIntyre, P. B. (2023). Extensive global wetland loss over the past three centuries. Nature, 614(7947), 281–286. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05572-6.
[24] Kundu, S., Kundu, B., Rana, N. K., & Mahato, S. (2024). Wetland degradation and its impacts on livelihoods and sustainable development goals: An overview. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 48, 419–434. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2024.05.024.
[25] Loi, L. V., & Hanh, H. L. M. (2023). Current status of freshwater resources used in the buffer zone community of U Minh Thuong National Park. Science Journal of Dong Thap University, 12(2), 97–106. doi:10.52714/dthu.12.2.2023.1037.
[26] Tung, N. S., & Dap, N. D. (2020). Analysis of the Biodiversity and Socio-Economic Values of the Wetlands in Vietnam. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(3), 25–31. doi:10.15587/2706-5448.2020.205046.
[27] Yadav, P. K., Jha, P., Joy, M. S., Bansal, T., Rawat, P., Begam, S., & Singh, A. K. (2025). Investigating the role of policies in the sustainable management of East Kolkata wetlands. Discover Global Society, 3(1), 79. doi:10.1007/s44282-025-00212-6.
[28] Douglas, O. O., & Victor, A. O. O. (2022). Optimizing community participation in the management of Yala Wetland Ecosystem, Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya: The Yala Hub Framework. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(1), 10–36. doi:10.5897/ajest2020.2940.
[29] Kiumbuku, S. K. (2022). Challenges of Community-Based Management of Protected Areas: Contested Trade-offs Between Livelihood and Conservation Interests in Chyulu Hills National Park, Kenya. Environment and Natural Resources Research, 12(2), 1. doi:10.5539/enrr.v12n2p1.
[30] Daileg, M. J. Y., Gatdula, J. R., Garalde, M. J. B., Ladao III, R. R., Magan, A. S., Martinez, C. R., Menil, L. V. C., Satorre, K. D., Tenerife, D. P., Tulod, J. P. V., Mamitag, K. R., & Pudan, J. C. (2025). Conservation at a Crossroads: Evaluating the Socio-Economic Impact of the Las Piñas-Parañaque Wetland Park on Adjacent Communities. DIT ADS International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(3), 132–143. doi:10.63941/dit.adsimrj.2025.1.3.1.31.
[31] Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., & Pirani, A. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis: Summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Geneva, Switzerland. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM.pdf (accessed on May 2026).
[32] Farooqi, T. J. A., Irfan, M., Portela, R., Zhou, X., Shulin, P., & Ali, A. (2022). Global progress in climate change and biodiversity conservation research. Global Ecology and Conservation, 38, 2272. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02272.
[33] Adeeyo, A. O., Ndlovu, S. S., Ngwagwe, L. M., Mudau, M., Alabi, M. A., & Edokpayi, J. N. (2022). Wetland Resources in South Africa: Threats and Metadata Study. Resources, 11(6), 54. doi:10.3390/resources11060054.
[34] Adesina, J. A., Tang, X., & Uduma-Olugu, N. (2025). Exploring the biodiversity conservation potentials and eco-benefits of wetland corridors through sustainable ecotourism and landscape design approach. Ensaios de Geografia, 12(25), e122510. doi:10.22409/eg.v12i25.65955.
[35] Ghorbani, A., Raufirad, V., Rafiaani, P., & Azadi, H. (2015). Ecotourism sustainable development strategies using SWOT and QSPM model: A case study of Kaji Namakzar Wetland, South Khorasan Province, Iran. Tourism Management Perspectives, 16, 290–297. doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2015.09.005.
[36] Scolozzi, R., Schirpke, U., Morri, E., D’Amato, D., & Santolini, R. (2014). Ecosystem services-based SWOT analysis of protected areas for conservation strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 543–551. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.040.
[37] Srđević, B., Srđević, Z., Ilić Paunić, M., & Ždero, S. (2025). Enhancing SWOT Analysis with DEMATEL and AHP for NbS and ES in Wetland Restoration: The Landscape of Outstanding Features—Vlasina, Serbia. HAICTA, 20. doi:10.3390/proceedings2025117020.
[38] Yap, C. K., & Al-Mutairi, K. A. (2025). Mangrove ecosystems in Western Asia: a literature review of trends, conservation gaps, and sustainable management strategies. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 8. doi:10.3389/ffgc.2025.1556158.
[39] Christodoulou, A., & Cullinane, K. (2019). Identifying the main opportunities and challenges from the implementation of a port energy management system: A SWOT/PESTLE analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(21), 6046. doi:10.3390/su11216046.
[40] Sridhar, R., Sachithanandam, V., Mageswaran, T., Purvaja, R., Ramesh, R., Senthil Vel, A., & Thirunavukkarasu, E. (2016). A Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal and Environmental (PESTLE) approach for assessment of coastal zone management practice in India. International Review of Public Administration, 21(3), 216–232. doi:10.1080/12294659.2016.1237091.
[41] Kolios, A., & Read, G. (2013). A Political, economic, social, technology, legal and environmental (PESTLE) approach for risk identification of the tidal industry in the United Kingdom. Energies, 6(10), 5023–5045. doi:10.3390/en6105023.
[42] Kordana, S., & Słyś, D. (2020). An analysis of important issues impacting the development of stormwater management systems in Poland. Science of the Total Environment, 727, 138711. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138711.
[43] Rendón, O. R., Garbutt, A., Skov, M., Möller, I., Alexander, M., Ballinger, R., Wyles, K., Smith, G., McKinley, E., Griffin, J., Thomas, M., Davidson, K., Pagès, J. F., Read, S., & Beaumont, N. (2019). A framework linking ecosystem services and human well-being: Saltmarsh as a case study. People and Nature, 1(4), 486–496. doi:10.1002/pan3.10050.
[44] Pandey, V. P., Manandhar, S., & Kazama, F. (2014). Climate change vulnerability assessment. Climate Change and Water Resources. Minh Thuong National Park, Viet Nam (IUCN Report), CRC Press, Florida, United States. doi:10.1201/b16969.
[45] Thai, T. L. (2020). Effect of flooding on peatland in U Minh Thuong National Park, Vietnam. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, 11(2), 57–64. doi:10.5897/jssem2019.0776.
[46] Van Cuong, C., Dart, P., Brown, S., Van Thang, T., & Le, V. T. M. (2019). Enhancing bird biodiversity through improved water management in a Vietnam wetland national park. Parks, 25(1), 55–68. doi:10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PARKS-25-1CVC.en.
[47] Khai, H. V., & Yabe, M. (2014). The demand of urban residents for the biodiversity conservation in U Minh Thuong National Park, Vietnam. Agricultural and Food Economics, 2(1), 10. doi:10.1186/s40100-014-0010-5.
[48] RIS. (2015). Ramsar information sheet of U Minh Thuong, Vietnam. Ramsar Information Sheet (RIS), Kien Giang, Vietnam. Available online: https://rsis.ramsar.org/RISapp/files/RISrep/VN2228RIS_1505_en.pdf (accessed on May 2026).
[49] Biggs, D. (2005). Managing a rebel landscape: Conservation, pioneers, and the revolutionary past in the U Minh forest, Vietnam. Environmental History, 10(3), 448–476. doi:10.1093/envhis/10.3.448.
[50] Tran, D. B. (2017). Restoration of Melaleuca Swamp Ecosystem for Bird Diversity in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. MOJ Ecology & Environmental Sciences, 2(6), 234–241. doi:10.15406/mojes.2017.02.00040.
[51] DIT. (2021). Overseas business risk: Vietnam. UK’s Department for International Trade (DIT), London, United Kingdom. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/overseas-business-risk-vietnam/overseas-business-risk-vietnam (accessed on May 2026).
[52] World Bank, & Ministry of Planning & Investment of Vietnam. (2016). Vietnam 2035: Toward prosperity, creativity, equity, and democracy. The World Bank Group, Washington, D.C., United States. Available online: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/996421479825859721 (accessed on May 2026).
[53] U Minh Thuong National Park. (2023). Explanation of the Sustainable Forest Management Plan for the Period 2021-2030 of U Minh Thuong National Park. People’s Committee of Kien Giang Province, U Minh Thuong National Park, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
[54] Ibisch, P. L., Vega, E., & Herrmann, T. M. (2010). Interdependence of biodiversity and development under global change (second corrected edition). Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Technical Series No. 54.
[55] Gardner, R. C., Finlayson, M., Davidson, N., Fennessy, S., Coates, D., Darwall, W., Dema, M., Everard, M., McRae, L., Perennou, C., Stroud, D., van Dam, A., Bambaradeniya, C., Davies, P., Fang, W.-T., Hilomen, V., Kulindwa, K., Martinez, L., Ricaurte, L., et al. (2018). Global Wetland Outlook: State of the World’s Wetlands and their Services to People. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, Ramsar, Iran. doi:10.69556/GWO-2018-eng.
[56] Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. (2019). The sixth national report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. The Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam. Available online: https://www.cbd.int/doc/nr/nr-06/vn-nr-06-en.pdf (accessed on May 2026).
[57] Nuwer, R., & Bell, D. (2014). Identifying and quantifying the threats to biodiversity in the U Minh peat swamp forests of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Oryx, 48(1), 88–94. doi:10.1017/S0030605312000865.
[58] WCS. (2018). Summary report on wildlife law violations and enforcement in Vietnam, period 2013-2017. Wildlife Conservation Society, Vietnam Program, Hanoi, Vietnam.
[59] Thang, N. V., Nga, P. T. T., Huong, H. T. L., Thang, V. V., Phong, D. H., Huy, L. Q., Khiem, M. V., & Hien, N. X. (2020). Climate change scenario updated to 2020. Environmental Resources and Maps, Hanoi, Vietnam.
[60] Truong, D. D. (2022). Community awareness and participation in biodiversity conservation at Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, Vietnam. Biodiversitas, 23(1), 581–592. doi:10.13057/biodiv/d230163.
[61] Stuart, B. L. (2004). the Harvest and Trade of Reptiles At U Minh Thuong National Park, Southern Viet Nam. TRAFFIC Bulletin, 20(1), 25–34.
[62] Binh, N. A., Nhut, H. S., An, N. N., Phuong, T. A., Hanh, N. C., Thao, G. T. P., Pham, T. T., Hong, P. V., Ha, L. T. T., Bui, D. T., & Hoa, P. V. (2021). Thirty-year dynamics of LULC at the dong Thap Muoi area, Southern Vietnam, using google earth engine. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(4), 226. doi:10.3390/ijgi10040226.
[63] UNODC. (2018). Pangolin scale. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Vienna, Austria. Available online: https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/wildlife/2020/WWLC20_Chapter_4_Pangolin.pdf (accessed on May 2026).
[64] Pimm, S. L., Alibhai, S., Bergl, R., Dehgan, A., Giri, C., Jewell, Z., Joppa, L., Kays, R., & Loarie, S. (2015). Emerging Technologies to Conserve Biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30(11), 685–696. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.008.
[65] Vu, T. T., Nguyen, T. C., Doherty, P. F., Nguyen, H. T., Clink, D. J., Nguyen, M. D., Dong, H. T., & Giang, T. T. (2023). Using mobile smartphones and bioacoustics to monitor endangered bird species. Ibis, 165(4), 1368–1377. doi:10.1111/ibi.13215.
[66] Nguyen, T. G., Phan, K. A., & Huynh, T. H. N. (2022). Major concerns of surface water quality in south-west coastal regions of Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Sustainable Environment Research, 32(1), 46. doi:10.1186/s42834-022-00156-5.
[67] Nguyễn, T. H. (2017). Overview of agricultural pollution in Vietnam: The cultivation sector. World Bank Group, Washington, D.C., United States. Available online: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/681201516788003445/pdf/122934-WP-PUBLIC-Vietnam-crops-VNM.pdf (accessed on May 2026).
[68] Toan, P. Van, Sebesvari, Z., Bläsing, M., Rosendahl, I., & Renaud, F. G. (2013). Pesticide management and their residues in sediments and surface and drinking water in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Science of the Total Environment, 452–453, 28–39. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.026.
[69] Stimson Center. (2026). Mekong infrastructure tracker [Interactive map]. Mekong Dam Monitor. Stimson Center, Washington, D.C., United States. Available online: https://www.stimson.org/project/mekong-dam-monitor/ (accessed on May 2026).
[70] MONRE. (2020). Climate change scenario for Vietnam, 2020 update. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE), Hanoi, Vietnam. Available online: https://imh.ac.vn/files/doc/2020/KB%20BDKH%202912.pdf (accessed on May 2026).
[71] Joosten, H. (2015). Peatlands, climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation: An issue brief on the importance of peatlands for carbon and biodiversity conservation and the role of drained peatlands as greenhouse gas emission hotspots. The Nordic Co-operation, Copenhagen K, Denmark. doi:10.6027/ANP2015-727
[72] Harrison, M. E., Wijedasa, L. S., Cole, L. E. S., Cheyne, S. M., Choiruzzad, S. A. B., Chua, L., Dargie, G. C., Ewango, C. E. N., Honorio Coronado, E. N., Ifo, S. A., Imron, M. A., Kopansky, D., Lestarisa, T., O’Reilly, P. J., van Offelen, J., Refisch, J., Roucoux, K., Sugardjito, J., Thornton, S. A., … Page, S. (2020). Tropical peatlands and their conservation are important in the context of COVID-19 and potential future (zoonotic) disease pandemics. PeerJ, 8, 10283. doi:10.7717/peerj.10283.
[73] Tian, Y., Wu, Z., Li, M., Wang, B., & Zhang, X. (2022). Forest Fire Spread Monitoring and Vegetation Dynamics Detection Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sensing, 14(18), 4431. doi:10.3390/rs14184431.
- The authors retain all copyrights. It is noticeable that authors will not be forced to sign any copyright transfer agreements.
- This work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
